Contact Us for a Free Consultation 570-468-7603


Is The Corporate Transparency Act Unconstitutional?

Posted by Scott Lynett, Esq. | Mar 15, 2024 | 0 Comments

In the world of small businesses and corporate America, a recent court decision has stirred quite a buzz. Let's dive into what's been happening with the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) following a significant ruling in the case of National Small Business United v. Yellen. This event marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate about business privacy, transparency, and the efforts to combat financial crimes.

 Understanding the Corporate Transparency Act

First things first, the Corporate Transparency Act was introduced as part of a broader defense bill in 2021 with a noble goal: to peel back the layers of secrecy around the ownership of small corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs). The reason? To make it harder for bad actors to misuse American businesses for money laundering, financing terrorism, and other illicit activities. By requiring companies to report their "beneficial owners" (essentially, the people who truly own or control these businesses) to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the U.S. government aimed to create a more transparent business environment.

 The Legal Challenge

However, not everyone was on board with this new mandate. The National Small Business United, among others, raised concerns about the implications of the CTA, arguing that it imposed undue burdens on small businesses and infringed upon state rights to regulate business affairs. They contended that the act would saddle small business owners with additional administrative work and privacy concerns, potentially hampering their operations.

These concerns led to a legal battle that culminated in a significant ruling by a federal district court. In the case of National Small Business United v. Yellen, the court had to weigh the balance between the government's interest in preventing financial crimes and the rights and burdens of small business owners.

 The Court's Decision

In a move that surprised many, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, effectively putting a pause on the implementation of the CTA. The court agreed that the Act could indeed impose significant burdens on small businesses and raised questions about the federal government's overreach into areas traditionally governed by state law.

This decision has sparked a wide range of reactions. Supporters of the CTA argue that the ruling could hinder the U.S. government's ability to combat financial crimes effectively. On the other hand, small business advocates have hailed the decision as a victory for business privacy and autonomy.

 The Road Ahead

So, what does this mean for the future of the Corporate Transparency Act and, by extension, for small businesses and corporate transparency in the U.S.?

1. Legal Appeals and Ongoing Litigation: The federal government is likely to appeal the district court's decision, meaning the debate over the CTA is far from over. The case could eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court, where a final decision on the Act's fate will be made.

2. Impact on Small Businesses: For now, small businesses must still comply with CTA, as the ruling only applies to the plaintiffs in that case. It's essential for business owners to stay informed about the legal developments around the CTA, as future rulings could change the compliance landscape.

3. A Call for Balanced Solutions: This legal saga highlights the need for a balanced approach to achieving corporate transparency while minimizing the burden on small businesses. It's possible that amendments to the CTA or entirely new legislation could emerge, aiming to strike a better balance between these competing interests.

4. Implications for Financial Crime Prevention: The court ruling does not diminish the importance of fighting financial crimes. Regardless of the CTA's fate, expect ongoing efforts from both the government and the private sector to find effective ways to combat money laundering and terrorism financing, perhaps through technology solutions or enhanced regulatory cooperation.


The recent ruling in National Small Business United v. Yellen represents a significant moment in the ongoing conversation about corporate transparency, privacy, and the role of government in business regulation. As the legal battle over the Corporate Transparency Act continues, it's crucial for all stakeholders, from policymakers to business owners, to engage in constructive dialogue and seek solutions that safeguard the interests of small businesses while advancing the fight against financial crimes. The outcome of this legal challenge could set important precedents for how the U.S. navigates the complex interplay between business privacy and transparency in the years to come. Whether you're a business owner or a policymaker, now is the time to join the conversation and shape the future of corporate transparency and privacy rights. Feel free to use the link below to schedule a free consultation with my office today to discuss how these developments may impact your business or legal strategy and ensure that your voice is heard in this critical dialogue.

About the Author


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today

Legacy Planning is committed to answering your questions about Estate Planning issues in Scranton and Eastern Pennsylvania. We offer consultations and we'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

By Phone Virtual